Thursday, February 17, 2011

Bottle water vs tap water




Do you drink bottled water because you believe it to be safer and healthier than tap water?

In our efforts to make informed decisions and take responsibility for our own health and well-being, it makes sense to take a hard look at one of our most basic health needs -- safe drinking water.

While tap water is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency and state and local governments, bottled water is the responsibility of the Food and Drug Administration, and according to the non-profit consumer organization, FoodandWaterWatch.org:

40 percent of bottled water originates from the tap, with added minerals or filtration.

Municipal water is not permitted to contain E. coli or fecal coliform bacteria. FDA rules for bottled water include no such prohibitions.

Municipal water from surface sources must be filtered and disinfected, or it must have strict pollution controls. There are no filtration or disinfection requirements for bottled water at the federal level. The only source-water protection, filtration or disinfection provisions for bottled water are delegated to the states.

Cities must have their water tested by government-certified labs. No certification requirement exists for bottlers.

Municipal tap water must be tested for coliform bacteria 100 or more times per month. Bottled water plants only have to test once a week.

In a June 9, 2009 report to Congress, the Government Accountability Office, stated:

FDA and state bottled water labeling requirements are similar to labeling requirements for other foods, but the information provided to consumers is less than what EPA requires of public water systems under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Like other foods, bottled water labels must list ingredients and nutritional information and are subject to the same prohibitions against misbranding.

In 2000, FDA concluded that it was feasible for the bottled water industry to provide the same types of information to consumers that public water systems must provide. The agency was not required to conduct rulemaking to require that manufacturers provide such information to consumers, however, and it has not done so.

Nevertheless, GAO’s work suggests that consumers may benefit from such additional information. For example, when GAO asked cognizant officials in a survey of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, whether their consumers had misconceptions about bottled water, many replied that consumers often believe that bottled water is safer or healthier than tap water. GAO found that information comparable to what public water systems are required to provide to consumers of tap water was available for only a small percentage of the 83 bottled water labels it reviewed, companies it contacted, or company Web sites it reviewed.

Above and beyond the health issue, bottled water comes at a much higher price than does tap water, both economically and environmentally. That’s two strikes against bottled water. So is it really safer than tap water?

The United States, bottled water costs between $0.25 and $2 per bottle while tap water costs less than US$0.01. In 1999, according to a NRDC study, U.S. consumers paid between 240 and 10,000 times more per unit volume for bottled water than for tap water.Typically 90 percent or more of the cost paid by bottled water consumers goes to things other than the water itself—bottling, packaging, shipping, marketing, retailing, other expenses, and profit.In some areas, tap water may contain added fluoride, which helps prevent tooth decay and cavities.The addition of fluoride is also seen by some to be a long-term health hazard.
Bottled water has reduced amounts of copper, lead, and other metal contaminants since it does not run through the plumbing pipes where tap water is exposed to metal corrosion. However, this varies by the household and plumbing system.In a study with 57 bottled water samples and tap water samples, all of the tap water samples had a bacterial content under 3 CFUs/mL and the bottled water samples' bacterial content ranged from 0.01-4900 CFUs/mL(colony-forming unit). Most of the water bottle samples were under 1 CFU/mL, though there were 15 water bottle samples containing 6-4900 CFUs/mL. In another study comparing 25 different bottled waters, most of the samples resulted exceeding the contaminant level set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency‎ (EPA) for mercury, thallium, and thorium. Being exposed to these contaminants in high concentration for long periods of time can cause liver and kidney damage, and increase risk for lung and pancreas disease.
In much of the developed world chlorine is often added as a disinfectant. If the water contains organic matter, this can produce other products in the water such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids resulting in off-smell or taste. The level of residual chlorine found at around 0.0002 g per litre which is too small to directly cause any health problems.The chlorine concentration recommended by World Health Organization is between 0.0005 and 0.0002 g/L.
The Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club and World Wildlife Fund have all urged their supporters to consume less bottled water. Anti-bottled water campaigns and organizations, such as Corporate Accountability International, typically argue that bottled water is no better than tap water, and emphasize the environmental side-effects of disposable plastic bottles.
The Showtime series Penn & Teller: Bullshit! demonstrated, in a 2003 episode, that in a controlled setting, diners could not discern between bottled water and water from a garden hose behind the restaurant.
The United Church of Christ, United Church of Canada, National Council of Churches, National Coalition of American Nuns and Presbyterians for Restoring Creation are among some of the religious organizations that have raised questions about whether or not the "privatization" of water is ethical. They regard the industrial purchase and repackaging at a much higher resale price of a basic resource as an unethical trend.
The recent documentary Tapped argues against the bottled water industry, asserting that tap water is healthier, more environmentally sustainable and more ecologically just than bottled water. The film focuses on the bottled water industry in the United States. The film has largely seen positive reviews, and has spawned college campus groups such as Beyond the Bottle.
Bottled water service
Source: - wikipedia.org



Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Bottle manufacturer in India

United Glass Company - India
Manufacturers of lug caps and plastic closures, pet bottles, glass bottles and soda caps.

Business Type : Wholesale Suppliers / Manufacturer
Address: 1102, Bazar Paiwalan, Near Jama Masjid, Delhi India
Website : http://www.unitedglassco.in

UNIQUEPET - India
Manufacturers of Pet Bottle, Jar & Containers.

Business Type : Manufacturer
Address: 120, Arihant Complex, Station Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh India
Website : http://www.uniquepet.net

Real Pet and Polymers - India
Manufacturers of pharmaceutical pet bottles, food pet bottles, syrup bottles, pharmaceutical pet jars, food pet jars, pharmaceutical plastic caps, pharmaceutical dosage caps, and other related pharmaceutical packaging material.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: C/c 23, First Floor, Gda Appartments, Old Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh India
Website : http://www.realpetandpolymers.com

Kripa Plastic Industries - India
Manufacturers of Plastic Products, Bottles, Hdpe Bottles, Bottle Caps, Cosmetic & Cream Containers, Shampoo and Jelly Containers, Dropper Plastic Bottles, Plastic Container, Toner Bottles, Droppers, Plastic Tablet Containers, Plastic Cans, Liquid Bottles, Homeopathic Bottles, Rib Containers, Plastic Pet Bottles, Round Plastic Jars and Small Plastic Bottles.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Wholesale Suppliers / Exporters
Address: 311, Shankala Industrial Estate, Gogatewadi, Goregaon (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra India
Website : http://www.kripaplastic.in

Daga Poly Containers Pvt. Ltd. - India
Manufacturers of Plastic Packaging Materials, Plastic Pet Bottles, Plastic Pet Jars, Plastic Pet Containers, HDPE Containers, HDPE & Pet Jerrycan, Pet Bottles, Plastic Blow Moulding, Plastic Injection Moulding, Jars etc.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: Kolkata, West Bengal India
Website : http://www.dagapoly.com

Avani Plast - India
Manufacturers of Plastic Buckets, Plastic Drum, Plastic Patla, Plastic Manhole Cover, Plastic Tub, Water Storage Tank Lids, Washing Bats, Plastic Mug, Plastic Basket, Plastic Tanks, PVC Tanks, Plastic Bottles, Plastic Container, PET Bottles, Plastic Products, Frp Tanks, Washroom Supplies, Manhole Covers, Storage Tank Lids etc.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Exporters / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: 125, Vikas Industrial Estate, Opp. Anil Starch Mill, Anil Mill Road Bapunagar, Ahmedabad, Gujarat India
Website : http://www.avaniplast.com

Oswal International - India
Manufacturers of textile products, pet bottles, agarbatti, cushions cover, bed sheet, pillow, rugs, covers, handicrafts and plastic products.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Exporters / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: 11 Bane Vihar, Jodhwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan India

Padma Plastic - India
Manufacturers of plastic products like milk bottle, juice bottle, lubricant bottle, thinner bottle, floor cleaner bottle, toilet cleaner bottle, chemical bottle, food supplement container, jerry can, pet bottle and measuring cup.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Exporters / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: B- 2318, D. S. I. D. C., Narela Industrial Area, delhi India


Renuka Industries - India
We are the manufacturers of plastic pet bottle, pharma pet bottle, plastic pharma bottles, pet bottles, plastic bottles, plastic ring bottles, plastic cough syrup bottles and plastic pharma bottles.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: Plot No.-42 & 43, MIDC Area, Satpur, Nashik, Maharashtra India


Lakshmi Metal Ind - India
Manufacturers of Tea-lite, H-light, Pharmaceutical Packaging Materials, Candles, Aluminium Cups, Injection Seal, Aluminium Caps, P.p Cap, Pilfer Proof Cap, Glass Bottles, Pet Bottles, Lug Cap and Crown Cap.

Business Type : Wholesale Suppliers / Exporters / Manufacturer
Address: 11/62, Geeta Colony, Near Police Station, New Delhi India
Website : http://www.lakshmimetal.com


Divine Pet - India
Manufacturers of Confectionery Jar, Confectionery Pet Jar, Cosmetic Jars, Pet Bottles, Oil Bottles, Fridge Bottles, Edible Pet Bottles, Pickles Pet Jar, Pet Blow Molding Machine, Plastic Products, Plastic Machinery.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Exporters / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: Agarwal Udyog Nagar, Satavli Road, Valvi, Mumbai, Maharashtra India
Website : http://www.divinepet.co.in


ML POLYMERS - India
Manufacturers of pet products, pet bottles, pet jars and plastics bottles.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Exporters / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: Plot No. 351/31, Jawahar Nagar, Moulaali, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh India
Website : http://www.smlploymers.com


Mark Pack - India
Manufacturers of Pharmaceutical Packaging, Pet Bottles, Pharmaceutical Pet Bottles, Pharmaceutical Bottles, Hdpe Bottles, Plastic Pet Bottle, Pharmaceutical Pet Jars, Syrup Bottles, Pharmaceutical Plastic Caps and Pharmaceutical Dosage Caps.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Exporters / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: 24-113/1/6, L.N. Nagar Colony, I.D.A. UPPAL, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh India
Website : http://www.markpack.co.in


Alpha Product - India
Manufacturers of Pet Bottle, Jar Container and Hdpe Bottles Unit.

Business Type : Manufacturer / Wholesale Suppliers
Address: 6, Shakti Vijay Co. op. SOC. Near Lake View Garden, Piplod, Surat, Gujarat India
Website : http://www.alphaproduct.net
Share/Bookmark

Soft Drink

1. Why is the soft drink industry so profitable?
An industry analysis through Porter’s Five Forces reveals that market forces are favorable for profitability.

Defining the industry: Both concentrate producers (CP) and bottlers are profitable. These two parts of the industry are extremely interdependent, sharing costs in procurement, production, marketing and distribution. Many of their functions overlap; for instance, CPs do some bottling, and bottlers conduct many promotional activities. The industry is already vertically integrated to some extent. They also deal with similar suppliers and buyers. Entry into the industry would involve developing operations in either or both disciplines.
Beverage substitutes would threaten both CPs and their associated bottlers. Because of operational overlap and similarities in their market environment, we can include both CPs and bottlers in our definition of the soft drink industry. In 1993, CPs earned 29% pretax profits on their sales, while bottlers earned 9% profits on their sales, for a total industry profitability of 14% (Exhibit 1). This industry as a whole generates positive economic profits. Rivalry: Revenues are extremely concentrated in this industry, with Coke and Pepsi, together with their associated bottlers, commanding 73% of the case market in 1994. Adding in the next tier of soft drink companies, the top six controlled 89% of the market. In fact, one could characterize the soft drink market as an oligopoly, or even a duopoly between Coke and Pepsi, resulting in positive economic profits. To be sure, there was tough competition between Coke and Pepsi for market share, and this occasionally hampered profitability. For example, price wars resulted in weak brand loyalty and eroded margins for both companies in the 1980s.
The Pepsi Challenge, meanwhile, affected market share without hampering per case profitability, as Pepsi was able to compete on attributes other than price.
Substitutes: Through the early 1960s, soft drinks were synonymous with “colas” in the mind of consumers.
Over time, however, other beverages, from bottled water to teas, became more popular, especially in the 1980s and 1990s. Coke and Pepsi responded by expanding their offerings, through alliances (e.g. Coke and Nestea), acquisitions (e.g. Coke and Minute Maid), and internal product innovation (e.g. Pepsi creating Orange Slice), capturing the value of increasingly popular substitutes internally. Proliferation in the number of brands did threaten the profitability of bottlers through 1986, as they more frequent line set-ups, increased capital investment, and development of special management skills for more complex manufacturing operations and distribution. Bottlers were able to overcome these operational challenges through consolidation to achieve economies of scale. Overall, because of the CPs efforts in diversification, however, substitutes became less of a threat.

Power of Suppliers: The inputs for Coke and Pepsi’s products were primarily sugar and packaging. Sugar could be purchased from many sources on the open market, and if sugar became too expensive, the firms could easily switch to corn syrup, as they did in the early 1980s. So suppliers of nutritive sweeteners did not have much bargaining power against Coke, Pepsi, or their bottlers. NutraSweet, meanwhile, had recently come off patent in 1992, and the soft drink industry gained another supplier, Holland Sweetener, which reduced Searle’s bargaining power and lowering the price of aspartame. With an abundant supply of inexpensive aluminum in the early 1990s and several can companies competing for contracts with bottlers, can suppliers had very little supplier power. Furthermore, Coke and Pepsi effectively further reduced the supplier of can makers by negotiating on behalf of their bottlers, thereby reducing the number of major contracts available to two. With more than two companies vying for these contracts, Coke and Pepsi were able to negotiate extremely favorable agreements. In the plastic bottle business, again there were more suppliers than major contracts, so direct negotiation by the CPs was again effective at reducing supplier power.

Power of buyers: The soft drink industry sold to consumers through five principal channels: food stores, convenience and gas, fountain, vending, and mass merchandisers (primary part of “Other” in “Cola Wars…” case).

Share/Bookmark

Bottle water safe ?

Bottled Water: How Safe?
The bottled water industry has spent billions over the past decade to sell you on the idea that bottled water is better than tap water. Well the short answer is they are both unhealthy. One of the most ironic parts of the bottled water tragedy is that the water bottling industry gets the water free, filters it, bottles it and sells it back to us at 1,900% profit. The ironic part is that tap water is legislated to be 7.0 pH neutral. They first dump a TON of cholrine in the water to kill off all the bad bacteria, this makes it highly acidic.
In India around 100 companies sell an estimated 424 million litres of bottled water valued at around Rs 200 crore in the country annually . Most bottlers claim that their water is 100 per cent bacteria-free and contains minerals that make it tastier and healthier. But is the water in these bottles really safe to drink? Do they conform to international or national standards?
To find out, the Ahmedabad-based Consumer Education and Research Society (CERS), an independent non-profit institution with a sophisticated product-testing laboratory, recently carried out a detailed study on 13 major brands of bottled water available in the country. The national brands -- Bisleri (separate samples were taken from their units in Bangalore, Ghaziabad, Calcutta and Baroda) and Bailley (Mumbai and Surat) -- were selected on the basis of their dominant position in the overall market. Bisil (Mehsana), Golden Eagle (Chennai), Aquaspa (Mumbai),Saiganga (Ahmednagar), Nirantar (Thane), Trupthi (Chennai) and Yes (Nadiad) were included because of their regional popularity. To conform to international standards for such testing, 21 bottles of each brand were tested in the CERS laboratory against "analytical" and "sensory" parameters as well as for "microbiological" contamination. To ensure fairness, the results were sent to the individual companies for their comments.
So how safe is bottled water? Not that safe, says the CERS survey. As many as 10 of the 13 brands had foreign floating objects in clear violation of norms. Again during a surprise inspection by the health committee chairman Manjunatha Reddy and team at two mineral water units in the Bangalore on January 11, 2011, it was
found that mineral water production unit owners were bottling borewell water. The units were also illegally using several branded labels on the bottles to market the water. The standing committee visited a mineral water production unit called AM Enterprises and found the owner selling water without an ISI mark from the Bureau of India Standards. He was found mixing mineral water with borewell water and selling it in cans to the public.


Water resources over-exploited
The majority of the bottling plants are dependent on groundwater. They create huge water stress in the areas where they operate because groundwater is also the main source - in most places the only source - of drinking water in India.This has created huge conflict between the community and the bottling plants.
Private companies in India can siphon out, exhaust and export groundwater free because the groundwater law in the country is archaic and not in tune with the realities of modern capitalist societies. The existing law says that "the person who owns the land owns the
groundwater beneath". This means that, theoretically, a person can buy one square metre of land and take all the groundwater of the surrounding areas and the law of land cannot object to it. This law is the core of the conflict between the community and the companies and the major reason for making the business of bottled water in the country highly lucrative.
Take for instance the case of Coca-Cola's bottling plant in drought-prone Kala Dera near Jaipur. Coca-Cola gets its water free except for a tiny cess (for discharging the wastewater) it pays to the State Pollution Control Board - a little over Rs.5,000 a year during 2000-02 and Rs.24,246 in 2003. It extracts half a million litres of water every day - at a cost of 14 paise per 1,000 litres. So, a Rs.10 per litre Kinley water has a raw material cost of just 0.02-0.03 paise. (It takes about two to three litres of groundwater to make one litre of bottled water.)
On April 7, more than 1,500 villagers defied a police cordon and marched to Coca-Cola's bottling plant in Mehdiganj village, Varanasi, in Uttar Pradesh state, demanding that the company immediately shut down its bottling plant. In January, the New Delhi-based Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) advised Coca-Cola to shut a bottling plant in the drought-stricken state of Rajasthan.
India's Ministry of Water Resources has ranked 80% of ground water resources in Rajasthan as "over- exploited" and nearly 34% resources as "dark/ critical", the gravest ranking across the country
Share/Bookmark

Pet Bottle Recycled

Using Recycled Pet

There are remarkable users for collected PET containers.
When you deposit your PET bottles for recycling, you can be confident that they will be made into high quality product. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) containers are recycled into new plastic bottles and other packaging items, fibers for filling ski jackets and quilts, for carpets, even for knitwear and fleece garments. Reprocessed PET is used to make strapping and industrial textiles, roofing felts and protective clothing. PET containers are fully compatible with the safe incineration of municipal solids waste. In many countries the good calorific value of the polymer is utilized to produce electricity or provide steam for district heating.

Adaptable PET

PET containers are being reused, recycled and recovered but unfortunately, not in India. successful recycling programme depends not only on collecting the empties; recyclables must also be made into products that prove beneficial & cost effective Thanks to the sustained efforts in the west, innovations of manufacturers and recycles, there is no shortage of excellent new users for recovered PET.

Staple Fibre

75% of the recovered European PET produces polyester fibres. Reprocessed flakes are melted and spun into strands. The length and thickness of the fibre determine the products made. Fibre lengths from 5mm to 150mm are termed “staples grades” and are the largest single market. Larger diameter fibres (>6 decitex) fill anoraks, sleeping bags and soft toys.

Recycled PET is also used to spin smaller diameter fibres (c.3 decitex). These can be woven into fleece fabrics for products such as jackets and scarves. Such fabrics can contain over 95%-recycled content.
Major outdoor clothing companies already recognize the benefits of these “recycled garments” and are introducing new ranges. A “recycled” fleece jacket uses 25 PET bottles! Polyester fibers are being engineered to provide the same qualities as upholstery foams. 35%-recycled content has been introduced to these advanced hollow “conjugated” polyester fibers.

Other uses
Egg cartons and other “formed containers” account for some 8% of recycled PET usage. PET containers for toiletries and household products are able to “close the recycling loop” because bottles using a percentage of post consumers PET are being introduced in growing quantities. In some cases the recovered PET is added into the packaging as a sandwich layer, between two layers of virgin polymer. This is known as “multi layer” technology.
Manufacturers predict multi-layer bottles can contain at least 50% recovered PET. Single layer containers can use even higher quantities of recycled material than this. All these containers remain recyclable. Multi-layer soft drink bottles using recycled PET are on sale in a number of countries worldwide including Switzerland and Sweden. Though at a very nascent stage, the PET recycling HAS to come as the usage of PET as best packaging medium is gaining ground rapidly.



Share/Bookmark

Rinsing filling

Though BIS has not put any restriction on manual filling, humid Indian conditions makes the product susceptible to external contamination due to unhygienic conditions. Therefore, automation in post processing stage is strongly recommended. Monoblock machines, capable to rinse, fill & cap covered in one single enclosure is recommended as this ensures quick packing hence less chances of contamination through air.

Monoblock machines offer small footprints and quick transport distance between filling and closing for highly secured production. As they outperform functions that normally require employment of several other machines, Monoblock machines are effectively crafted with modular designs that efficiently help to change over to different functions, product sizes and shapes. The frequency converter helps to control the production speed.
The complete parts coming in contact with water i.e. pipelines nozzles and tanks should have stainless steel construction. The caps enclosure too, should have disinfecting arrangement (UV) to avoid contamination arising out of improper disinfecting of caps at early stages.

Since PET has static charge, it attracts lot of contaminants from the atmosphere and thorough rinsing is required. As jet rinsing ensures proper cleaning of PET bottles, the risk of external contamination is minimized. These machines reduce the chance of product contamination by capping containers as soon as they are filled. Direct transfer also reduces the chances of spilling. This speeds up entire process giving the consumer absolutely pure water.

Share/Bookmark

Process- Drinking water bottle

I would like to introduce some process how the water is treated before it it packaged in bottles.

Processes, technology and equipment employed to purify the water

There are various processes employed to purify the water and various combinations of the processes mentioned below are incorporated to ensure that final composition of the product confirms to latest BIS norms.

Desalination

Desalination is defined as the removal of dissolved salts from various waters – brackish, sea, etc. Desalination can be performed by several processes including two-membrane process, namely reverse osmosis and electrodialysis. The other membrane process, which can be employed for partial desalination, include ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.


Reverse Osmosis

RO membranes are effective in removing constituents and are efficient in removing TDS in any feedwater up to 40,000 ppm (i.e. sea water.)

Osmosis is natural bio-chemical process that affects the movement or diffusion of water molecules through a semi-permeable membrane towards a solution that has high TDS, and it is induced by osmotic pressure. RO is accomplished by forcing water molecules under pressure through a semi-permeable membrane out of solution that has high TDS. The feedwater on the inlet side becomes brine and water that passes through – permeates, becomes the product water.

RO membrane can be distinguished from other membranes based on pore size, which is around 0.0005 microns. The pore size of RO membrane is small, that it functions primarily by diffusion instead of filtration or adsorption.

Nanofiltration (NF)

NF is effective in removing divalent ions (i.e. calcium and magnesium), larger monovalent ions (i.e. sulphate), high molecular weight organic molecules, and colour. NF membranes are efficient in softening feedwater below 1,000 mg/l TDS. These membranes provide significant rejection of hardness caused by dissolved calcium and magnesium. The pore size of NF membranes range between 0.0007 to 0.01 microns. (Taylor, 1989, 18)

Ultrafiltlration (UF)

UF is effective in removing high molecular weight proteins, bacteria and viruses. Rejection of monovalent and divalent ions are considerably less than RO and NF. UF membrane pores are smaller than MF but greater than NF, and range between 0.001 to 0.1 microns. The primary mechanism of constituent removal is filtration, however, some salts are transported across the semi-permeable membranes by diffusion.

Microfiltration (MF)

MF is effective in removing suspended solids of all types and larger colloids. These generally filter out suspended constituents in feedwater.

Ultra Violet Unit (UV)

Thorough research in last few years have given lot of confidence to water treatment professionals in terms of its effectiveness in microbiological treatment.


UV is a band of invisible light in the electromagnetic spectrum, in the range of 200-400 nm wavelengths, having germicidal effectiveness, which penetrates the microbial cell membrane to destroy the DNA molecule thus preventing cell replication.

UV is used to provide Bacterial Disinfection in water. As UV does not change the Physical or Chemical characteristics in water & does not have any residual properties left in treated water, it is widely used to disinfect the water for micro biological contamination.
The U.S. Public Health Service requires that UV disinfection equipment have a minimum UV dosage of 16000 uW sec/cm2 (microwatt seconds per square centimeter).

Recommended maximum concentration levels in Ultra Violet unit

Turbidity : 5 NTU [ Nephelometric turbidity unit ]
Suspended Solids : 10mg/Litre
Colour : None
pH : 6.5 to 8.5

Ozonation through Ozonator

What is Ozone?

Ozone, triatomic Oxygen is colourless, unstable & reactive gas with a acrid odour. It is strongest available sanitizer and decomposes back to oxygen without leaving any tresses and makes preferred choice for disinfection. Since it is a very reactive Disinfecting agent, & 3000 times more effective than any other known disinfectents, It destroys any Bacteria, Viruses, Cysts and Pathogens in a shortest possible time when it comes into contact with water .

Ozone Production

Ozone generation involves splitting of an Oxygen molecule into two highly unstable Oxygen atoms. These unstable Oxygen atoms combine with other Oxygen molecule to ultimately produce Ozone.

Dry air or Oxygen is passed through the Ozone cell consisting of two electrodes kept at a high potential with a dielectrics in between them. The Corona discharge formed in the gap energizes the Oxygen molecules, thereby converting a portion of Oxygen into Ozone. As Ozone is highly unstable & cannot be stored is produced at site where it is required.
Share/Bookmark

Water Industry

Introduction:-

As we all know that Water is the most important necessity for life. We can say that drinking-water needs for individuals vary depending on the climate, physical activity and the body culture. but if to think carefully average consumers it is estimated to be about two to four litres per day. Today in indian society there are number of cases of water borne diseases, increasing water pollution, increasing urbanization, increasing scarcity of pure and safe water . have made the bottled water business just like other consumer items in india and world wide. Potable and wholesome water at railway stations, tourists spots, and role of tourism corp. etc. has also added to the growth and demand of drinking packaged water bottle.
All the Big international and national brands Packaged water bottles are available in Indian market right from the malls to railway stations, bus stations, grocery stores and even at panwala's shop. Before few years bottle water. was considered as the rich people's choice, but now it is penetrated even in rural areas. The growth and status of Indian Bottled Industry in comparison with Western or Asian market, India is far behind in terms of quantum, infrastructure, professionalism and standards implementation. The per capita consumption of mineral water in India is a mere 0.5-liter compared to 111 liter in Europe and 45-liter in USA. Also As per UN study conducted in 122 countries, in connection with water quality, India's number was dismal 120. In comparison to global standards India's bottled water segment is largely unregulated.
Former President Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam has urged youngsters on July 17, 2010 to be aware of water conservation techniques to avoid grave water crisis in future."It is so sad that today, people are forced to buy water in plastic bottles. I am told that bottled water industry is worth nearly 10000 crore rupees and even big companies like the Coke and Pepsi are involved in this bottling of water and making money. So, it is imperative that we ought to save water," he added.
Do not be surprise if today's bottles water industry becomes next Oil industry by 2025.

Water Shortage and Health Awareness Driving Bottled Water Consumption in India. The Indian market is estimated at about Rs 1,000 Crore and is growing at whopping rate of 40 per cent. By 2010, it will reach Rs 4,000 -5,000 Crore with 33 per cent market for natural mineral water.
According to a national-level study, there are more than 200 bottled water brands in India and among them nearly 80 per cent are local brands. In fact, making bottled water is today a cottage industry in the country. Leave alone the metros, where a bottled-water manufacturer can be found even in a one-room shop, in every medium and small city and even some prosperous rural areas there are bottled water manufacturers.
While India ranks in the top 10 largest bottled water consumers in the world, its per capita per annum consumption of bottled water is estimated to be five litres which is comparatively lower than the global average of 24 litres. Today it is one of India's fastest growing industrial sectors. Between 1999 and 2004, the Indian bottled water market grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25 per cent - the highest in the world. The total annual bottled water consumption in India had tripled to 5 billion liters in 2004 from 1.5 billion liters in 1999. Global consumption of bottled water was nearing 200 billion liters in 2006.

Share/Bookmark

Beverage Industry

Hello friends,
I would like to discuss some useful points that are important to establish your own beverage company. There are few categories in this, products are different according to its manufacturing process, taste and chemical used to produce the final products.
It is manly divided in these categories-
(1) Packaged drinking water
(2) Packaged flavored drink
(3) Packaged Soda
(4) Packaged alcoholic drinks

Each and every product has its own limitations and different- different manufacturing process and have their own customer segment.
In india there are mainly few bigger companies which widely captured the market.
Main companies are as follows-
(1) Coca COLA
(2) Pepsi India
(3) Parle Agro
(4) Cempa
According to the market research it is assumed that coca cola has 54% market share in india in soft drink market.
Pepsi claims that they have also market share about 50% in indian market.
Remaining parle agro claim that they have market share for their packaged drinking water Bisleri more than about 60% .
Data may different but big companies play vital role in maret.
their marketing strategies, distribution system, manufacturing efficiency make the difference.
ANY WAY whatever these companies may claim, but i wanna discuss with you how to establish small scale company and how to enter in beverage sector with investing less amount of money.
Please visit my blog again to know more about this topic


Share/Bookmark